19 April 2016 : Review article
Endovascular vs. Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Nikolaos PatelisABCDEF, Demetrios MorisEF, Georgios KaraolanisD, Sotiris GeorgopoulosAEFDOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.897601
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:34-44
Abstract
Background: Patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are most often treated with open repair despite the fact that endovascular aneurysm repair is a less invasive and widely accepted method with clear benefits for elective aortic aneurysm patients. A debate exists regarding the definitive benefit in endovascular repair for patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aim of this literature review was to determine if any trends exist in favor of either open or endovascular repair. Material and Methods: A literature search was performed using PUBMED, OVID, and Google Scholar databases. The search yielded 64 publications. Results: Out of 64 publications, 25 were retrospective studies, 12 were population-based, 21 were prospective, 5 were the results of RCTs, and 1 was a case-series. Sixty-one studies reported on early mortality and provided data comparing endovascular repair (rEVAR) and open repair (rOR) for ruptured abdominal aneurysm groups. Twenty-nine of these studies reported that rEVAR has a lower early mortality rate. Late mortality after rEVAR compared to that of rOR was reported in 21 studies for a period of 3 to 60 months. Results of 61.9% of the studies found no difference in late mortality rates between these 2 groups. Thirty-nine publications reported on the incidence of complications. Approximately half of these publications support that the rEVAR group has a lower complication rate and the other half found no difference between the groups. Length of hospital stay has been reported to be shorter for rEVAR in most studies. Blood loss and need for transfusion of either red cells or fresh frozen plasma was consistently lower in the rEVAR group. Conclusions: Differences between the included publications affect the outcomes. Randomized control trials have not been able to provide clear conclusions. rEVAR can now be considered a safe method of treating rAAA, and is at least equal to the well-established rOR method.
Keywords: Aortic Rupture - surgery, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery, Endovascular Procedures - statistics & numerical data, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Prospective Studies
Most Viewed Current Articles
07 Jul 2022 : Laboratory Research 4,462
Cytotoxicity, Apoptosis, Migration Inhibition, and Autophagy-Induced by Crude Ricin from Ricinus communis S...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.936683
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2022; 28:e936683
01 Jun 2022 : Laboratory Research 4,390
Comparison of Sealing Abilities Among Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root-Canal Filling Cement, Antibacterial Biocerami...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.936319
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2022; 28:e936319
15 Jun 2022 : Clinical Research 4,377
Evaluation of Apical Leakage After Root Canal Obturation with Glass Ionomer, Resin, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol ...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.936675
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2022; 28:e936675
30 Oct 2023 : Original article 4,305
Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Academic Burnout Among Nursing College Students in China: ...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.940997
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2023; 29:e940997