H-Index
10
Scimago Lab
powered by Scopus
eISSN: 2325-4416
call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon-Fri 10 am - 2 pm EST

Logo

MSMbanner
AmJCaseRep

Annals
ISI-Home

Radiological and Clinical Differences between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability

Jinpeng Du, Lin Gao, Dageng Huang, Lequn Shan, Wentao Wang, Yong Fan, Dingjun Hao, Liang Yan

Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China (mainland)

Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924770

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924770

Available online: 2020-07-17

Published: 2020-09-12


BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw fixation is one of the most commonly used methods in spine surgery. We introduce a surgical robot system from China based on 3-dimensional fluoroscopy imaging and compare it with the commonly used O-arm navigation system. We study the differences in accuracy, safety, and clinical effect in auxiliary pedicle screw fixation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent thoracolumbar internal fixation in our hospital from 2017 to 2019 were divided into a robot and navigation group according to whether surgery was assisted by the Tinavi orthopedic robot or O-arm navigation system. Imaging data of patients were searched from the image system and accuracy of screw implantation was measured by Rampersaud A to D grade classification. Deviation sagittal, deviation transversal, and facet joint violation were also measured and calculated.
RESULTS: In total, 306 patients were included: 136 patients in the robot group with 760 screws implanted; 166 patients in the navigation group with 908 screws implanted. The accuracy of “perfect” and “clinically acceptable” pedicle screw implantation was 96.2% and 99.6%, respectively, in the robot group and 90.5% and 96.7%, respectively, in the navigation group, with a significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The sagittal and transversal deviations in the robot group were significantly less than those in the navigation group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The Tinavi orthopedic robot can significantly improve surgical accuracy and safety of pedicle screw fixation, as compared with that of O-arm navigation technology, without increasing complications. It shows great potential in clinical application.

Keywords: Bone Screws, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy, Patient Navigation, Robotics, Spine



Back