The Clinical Role of Preoperative Serum CA19-9 and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Levels in Evaluating the Resectability of Advanced Gallbladder Cancer

Background

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a relatively rare but highly lethal tumor of the biliary tract system, accounting for about 165000 cancer-related deaths per year worldwide [1,2]. The overall prognosis of patients with GBC is poor, with a 5-year mean survival rate of 5% to 10% [3]. Despite most patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage, because of the non-obvious symptoms and highly invasive nature of GBC, patients with advanced stage may benefit from aggressive radical resection, which may be the only potentially curative treatment [4,5]. Eligibility for radical resection is dependent on tumor stage and tumor biology [2,6], making preoperative assessment of the feasibility of curative resection for patients with advanced stage GBC essential. Moreover, accurate evaluation can avoid unnecessary surgery in patients ineligible for resection and reduce mortality rates.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) are cancer-associated antigens, measurements of which have been widely used to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with tumors of the digestive system, including pancreatic [7], bile duct [8], colorectal [9], and gastric [10] cancer. Moreover, measurements of CEA and CA19-9 concentrations can be used to evaluate the resectability of various cancers [11,12], including GBCs [13]. Radical resection is possible in most patients with early stage GBC (stage 0–I, AJCC 8th), with a satisfactory prognosis [14,15]. However, the radical resection rate of advanced GBC (stages II–IV) is much lower and variable. The present study therefore evaluated the ability of serum concentrations of CEA, CA19-9 and CA19-9 relative to serum total bilirubin concentration (adjusted CA19-9) to determine the resectability of advanced (stages II–IV) GBC.

Material and Methods

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Continuous data were reported as the mean±standard deviation (SD) and compared by one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical data were compared by Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. The optimal cut-offs for tumor-associated biomarkers were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and determination of the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for resectability were calculated for each cutoff value of each biomarker. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 software, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

During the study period from January 2012 to December 2016, 309 patients at our institution underwent surgery for potentially resectable of stage II–IV GBC, Of these 169 (54.7%) underwent R0 resection, as determined by postoperative pathological examination, 121 (39.2%) underwent R1/2 resection and 19 (6.1%) were unresectable. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 1. Patients were of mean age 60.0 years (range, 24 to 84 years), and 178 (57.6%) were women. Tumors were located in the body and fundus of the gallbladder in 169 (54.7%) patients, and in the neck and duct of the gallbladder in 140 (45.3%). Tumors in 238 (77.0%) patients were histologically classified as well and moderately differentiated, whereas tumors in 71 (23.0%) patients were poorly differentiated. Sex distribution, tumor site, and tumor differentiation did not differ significantly in the three groups of patients with R0, R1/2, and unresectable tumors. In contrast, AJCC stage correlated significantly with tumor resectability (P<0.001). Patients with unresectable tumors were younger than those who underwent R0 and R1/2 resection.

The mean concentrations of CA19-9, CEA, and adjusted CA19-9 were significantly lower in patients who underwent R0 resection than in those who underwent R1/2 resection and those with unresectable tumors (Table 2). These three concentrations were higher in patients with elevated (>23 μmol/L) than with lower (≤23 μmol/L) serum total bilirubin concentrations and correlated significantly with AJCC stages. Taken together these findings indicate that the serum concentrations of these three parameters correlated with the severity of GBC.

ROC curves were constructed and AUC analysis performed to evaluate the predictive value of each parameter. Adjusted CA19-9 had greater predictive value (AUC, 0.774; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.722–0.826; P<0.001) than total bilirubin (AUC, 0.572; 95% CI, 0.507–0.636; P=0.03), CEA (AUC, 0.648; 95%CI, 0.586–0.71; P <0.001), and CA19-9 (AUC, 0.728; 95%CI, 0.672–0.784; P<0.001) concentrations (Figure 1). The optimal cut-off points to assess resectability were 4.05 ng/mL (sensitivity, 66.9%; specificity, 60.0%) for CEA, 78.5 U/mL (sensitivity, 64.5%; specificity, 70.7%) for CA19-9 and 47.63 U/mL (sensitivity, 69.82%; specificity, 75%) for adjusted CA19-9 (Table 3). At a threshold of 78.5 U/mL, serum CA19-9 had a 72.67% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 62.26% negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting respectability, whereas an adjusted CA19-9 concentration <47.63 U/mL had a PPV of 77.12% and an NPV of 67.31%. These results indicated that adjusted CA19-9 was better than CA19-9 at predicting the resectability of GBC.

The 309 patients had a median survival time of 12 months and a 5-year survival rate of 5.83% (Figure 2). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates in patients who underwent R0 resection for GBC were 73.96%, 31.36%, and 9.47%, respectively, significantly better than for patients who underwent R1/2 resection. None of the patients with unresectable GBC survived for more than one year.

Discussion

GBC is the most common cancer of the biliary tract and the sixth most common gastrointestinal cancer [18]. Due to their atypical symptoms, frequent local invasion, early and frequent metastases, most tumors are diagnosed at advanced stage, with only about 1 in 5 GBCs diagnosed in early stages [19]. Despite improvements in surgical methods, only 25% of patients are eligible for potentially curative surgery [20]. The radical resection rate in patients with for advanced GBC, remains low and the proportion of fatal postoperative complications remains high. Moreover, unnecessary surgery for advanced GBC may delay appropriate systemic chemotherapy and increase health-care costs. An reliable and accurate preoperative assessment of GBC resectability is therefore of significant clinical importance.

Currently, the resectability of GBC is evaluated primarily by assessing clinical manifestations and performing radiological tests. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was regarded as the most sensitive diagnostic method for GB polypoid lesions, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 86% [21]. Multi-slice CT (MSCT) and MRI can provide more information about depth of tumor invasion, local extension and lymph node metastasis, but these methods frequently miss small occult hepatic and peritoneal metastases, resulting in unnecessary surgical exploration [22–24]. Although PET can be used for early detection of GBCs, as well as small (<1 cm) metastatic lymph nodes and lesions [25,26], its application is limited by the need for experienced radiologists and high costs. Staging laparoscopy has been recommended before laparotomy, as up to 37% of GBCs were determined to be unresectable by simple laparoscopy [27]. However, a study of 46 patients with potentially resectable GBC found that tumors were unresectable in 10 patients, two found by laparoscopy and eight at the time of laparotomy [28]. Simple and cost-effective measurements of tumor markers in serum may supplement radiological tests and staging laparoscopy to predict the resectability of GBCs.

CEA and CA19-9 are tumor-associated biomarkers in serum widely used to diagnose gastrointestinal cancers, including GBCs and to predict patient prognosis [29,30], indicating their importance in evaluating GBC resectability GBC. Serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations may also predict the resectability of pancreatic cancers [31–33], whereas preoperative measurements of serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 concentrations can assist in evluating the resectability of cholangiocarcinomas, a type of biliary tract cancer [12]. Moreover, a study of 292 patients with stage I–IV GBC reported that preoperative CA19-9 could predict tumor resectability [13], although that study did not consider the effect of tumor-associated elevation of total bilirubin concentration on serum levels of CEA and CA19-9.. The radical resection rate of stage 0-I GBC is high, with these patients having a 5-year survival rate over 60% [15,19].

The present study assessed the ability of CEA, CA19-9 and adjusted CA19-9 concentrations to predict the resectability of advanced stage GBC. An AUC between 0.5 and 0.7 is regarded as having low diagnostic value, whereas an AUC between 0.7 and 0.9 has moderate diagnostic value. In assessing the ability of these potential biomarkers to predict the resectability of GBC, we found that the AUCs were 0.648 for CEA, 0.728 for CA19-9 and 0.774 for adjusted CA19-9, making the latter parameter more diagnostic of GBC respectability than CEA and C19-9 concentrations.

Because of the high mortality rate and limited role of palliative resection in patients with advanced GBC, resectability in the present study was defined as R0 resection. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that survival rates were significantly higher in patients who underwent R0 resection than in those who underwent R1/2 resection and patients with unresectable tumors [13].

In general, it is not accurate and reasonable to assess the resectability of GBC only by measuring serum biomarkers. These markers, however, could supplement the clinical features, imaging findings, and other correlated factors, with comprehensive analysis providing better guidelines for treatment.

Conclusions

Adjusted CA19-9 concentration, which is easily calculated, is better than CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in predicting the resectability of advanced gallbladder cancer. Aberrantly high levels of adjusted CA19-9 and CA19-9 may indicate unresectable GBC. Prospective multicenter studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to assess this issue.