Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

31 August 2021: Clinical Research  

Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib: A Polish Experience

Wojciech Straś1ACDE, Joanna Gotlib2ACEF, Piotr Małkowski3ACDEFG*, Dariusz Wasiak3CDE, Andrzej Śliwczyński3BCDE, Mariusz Panczyk2ACDE, Olga Tronina4EF, Melania Brzozowska5BCD

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.931856

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e931856

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mortality caused by hepatocellular carcinoma is expected to rise in the upcoming decade. Sorafenib has become the preferred systemic treatment option in patients with unresectable HCC. This study aimed to present the median overall survival (OS) in a group of patients with advanced HCC, treated with sorafenib in Poland between 2011 and 2019.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analyzed group of patients was qualified for treatment with sorafenib, financed by the National Health Fund, based on the guidelines of the Polish Drug Program. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the OS curves, and the log-rank test was used for testing. Multivariate assessment of factors (sex and age) related to the time to death of the patient was done using Cox regression.

RESULTS: Of the 2072 treated patients, 75% were men (1556) and 25% were women (516). The minimum age of patients in the trial group was 18 years and the maximum age was 90 years. Among the 1556 analyzed cases in males, 27.44% (427) did not end with death (by the date of completing the analysis). The percentage of one-year survival for this population was 58.16%, and the 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 34.45%, 21.81%, and 9.72%, respectively. The percentage of censored cases in the 516 females was 25.78% (133). The 1-2-, 3-, and 5-year survival for this population was 59.30%, 36.27%, 22.47%, and 11.34%, respectively. Statistical tests did not reveal a significant difference in the curve profiles by sex. There were no associations between OS and age.

CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatment with sorafenib in accordance with the presented criteria allows for very good results, comparable to the results of selected groups of patients presented by other authors.

Keywords: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, sorafenib, Survival Rate, Adolescent, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Poland, young adult

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic cancer in the world and the sixth most common cancer in the world. In 2018 it was ranked as the fourth leading cause of death among all cancer types [1,2]. The frequency of its occurrence has been increasing in the USA, Europe, and Asia, and the mortality caused by this type of cancer is expected to rise in the upcoming decade [3]. The incidence of liver cancer is also increasing in Poland, reaching about 2000 new cases annually [4].

Since the majority of cases are diagnosed when the disease is highly advanced, the 5-year survival rate of patients with HCC does not exceed 20% [5]. According to the current recommendations, O and A grade patients are classified according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system for potentially curative therapies for liver resection or transplantation or thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) [5]. In patients not eligible for the treatments (eg, with a more advanced tumor, B or C grade according to BCLC classification system), who constitute 46% to 62% of all patients with HCC, loco-regional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) should be considered as a part of the strategy to downstage the patients to treatments that have a curative intent, or to systemic treatment [5,6]. In 2007, the SHARP randomized controlled trial demonstrated the superior efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib versus placebo in patients with advanced HCC, with median overall survival (OS) of 10.7 versus 7.9 months. Similar benefits of sorafenib versus placebo were reported in a phase III study conducted on patients from the Asia-Pacific region (6.5 versus 4.2 months) [7,8]. Based on the data, sorafenib has become the preferred systemic treatment option in patients with unresectable HCC [5,6]. In over 10 years of using sorafenib, there were numerous research analyses carried out on the impact of various predictive factors on OS [5,10–16]. An analysis of the factors affecting OS will help to forecast the effectiveness of sorafenib treatment with greater accuracy. Analyzing the use of sorafenib in patients as part of actual clinical practice allows us to confirm and supplement the results of studies obtained in clinical trials.

Material and Methods

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to present the median OS in a group of patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib in Poland between 2011 and 2019. The analyzed group of patients was qualified for treatment with sorafenib, financed by the National Health Fund, based on the guidelines of the Polish Drug Program (DP). Criteria for inclusion in the DP of sorafenib treatment were as follows: histologically or radiologically diagnosed HCC, unresectable tumor or failure of loco-regional therapy, performance status according to WHO 0–1, Child-Pugh A patients only, no extrahepatic spread, and no prior systemic therapy.

METHODS:

The study used secondary statistical analysis of the retrospective data on treated patients; the NHF provided the data. Drug Programs (DP) in Poland are carried out as part of separate therapeutic paths financed by the national payer, and the patient treatment protocol is strictly determined. With regard to the patients’ explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, the analyzed population is a highly homogenous group, which corresponds to the criteria of the clinical trial transferred onto real clinical practice. This method of analysis was successfully used in other published works related to disease classification, and medical and environmental issues [17,18].

The information from the period from 7 July 2011 to 31 July 2019 (98.2 months) applying to a population of 2072 treated patients was used for the analysis.

The analyzed group of patients with HCC was qualified for treatment with sorafenib based on the guidelines of the Polish DP, which assumes the following essential criteria for the patient’s inclusion for treatment and sorafenib dosing rules:

The daily dose of sorafenib is 800 mg (2×200-mg pills twice a day) with no breaks. Should drug-related clinically significant or severe adverse events (AEs) occur, the treatment with the medication shall be stopped until the symptoms are relieved, and reduction in the daily dose of sorafenib to 400 mg a day (2 pills×200 mg once a day) shall be considered. If clinically significant or severe adverse events are not alleviated within 4 weeks, despite a break in the drug administration, the treatment shall be stopped. If despite the dose reduction to 400 mg a day the clinically significant or severe adverse events re-occur, the drug dose shall be reduced to 400 mg administered every other day. It is not possible to further reduce the drug doses (eg, reoccurrence of clinically significant or severe adverse events), the therapy should be stopped.

The investigated aspects included the age and sex of the patients, OS median and percentage of 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival depending on the sex, as well as the therapy duration.

STATISTICAL METHODS:

The initial (minimum) date of inclusion into the DP was established as the starting date for the OS analysis in each patient, while 31 July 2019 was the cut-off date. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to plot the OS curves, and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, and likelihood ratio (−2Log (LR)) test were used for testing. Multivariate assessment of factors (sex and age) related to the time to death of the patient was done using Cox regression. The Cox regression model was applied to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Statistical analysis was performed in SAS® Enterprise Guide® ver. 8.2 software. Findings were considered significant with P value <0.05.

ETHICS APPROVAL:

The study did not require the approval of the Bioethical Commission as it was non-invasive and was carried out using data collected by a public institution. The data analyzed in the study were anonymized.

Results

Of the group of 2072 treated patients, 75% were men (1556) and 25% were women (516). The median age of males was 66.0 years (mean age 65.77 years [95% Cl: 65.27–66.27]), and the standard deviation was 10.01 years [95% Cl: 9.67–10.38]. The minimum age of patients in the trial group was 18 years, and the maximum age was 90 years. The median age of females was 68.0 years (mean age 66.75 years [95% Cl: 65.84–67.67]); the standard deviation was 10.60 years [95% Cl: 9.99–11.28]. The minimum age of patients in the trial group was 29 years, and the maximum age was 87 years (Figure 1).

The overall median survival was 14.86 months (445.8 days) [95% Cl: 14.00–16.13] for men, and 15.20 months (456 days) for women [95% Cl: 13.57–17.57] (Figure 2).

Of the 1556 analyzed cases for males, 27.44% (427) did not end with death by the date of completing the analysis (31 July 2019). The percentage of 1-year survival for this population was 58.16%, the 2-year survival was 34.45%, 3-year survival was 21.81%, and 5-year survival was 9.72%. The percentage of censored cases in the 516 females was 25.78% (133). The percentage of 1-year survival for this population was 59.30%, 2-year survival was 36.27%, 3-year survival was 22.47%, and 5-year survival was 11.34%. Statistical tests did not reveal a statistically significant difference in the curve profiles by sex (log-rank: P>0.489; Wilcoxon: P>0.559; −2Log (LR): P>0.388). There was no association between OS and age (HR=0.996, 95% CI [0.991; 1.001], P=0.125) or sex (HR=0.961, 95% CI [0.856; 1.079], P=0.497).

The data on therapy duration (in days) are summarized in Table 1.

Therapy duration in the study population:

Discussion

The presented analysis results apply to one of the most numerous and relatively homogenous populations of patients of all groups presented in the global literature. Bruix et al and Raoul et al carried out subanalyses of the SHARP trial on 448 and 602 patients, respectively, treated with sorafenib [5,14]. Chinese authors described 338 subjects [12], while Italian authors analyzed a group of 398 patients based on 10-year multicenter studies [9]. Japanese authors from different centers presented the results of research based on the material covering 1065 [11], 524 [18], and 508 [12] patients. Researchers from the United Kingdom presented the results of studies on a group of 448 subjects [15].

The OS of the patients treated with sorafenib presented in the papers ranges from 7 months [20] to 8.7 months, 9.7 months, 11.5 months [21,22], 15.3 months [18], 15.8 months [9], and up to 17.4 months [12]. The results depend on the tumor development stage, liver efficiency, general condition of the patients, and occurrence of portal thrombosis in the analyzed groups. According to different authors, the sorafenib treatment efficacy predictors affecting OS are age, sex, race, general condition, B or C stage of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC staging) classification, presence of extrahepatic spread (EHS), macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), number and size of the tumors, cirrhosis etiology, bilirubin, albumin, ALBI (albumin-bilirubin grade), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), Child-Pugh score, AFP, body mass index (BMI), and sorafenib dosage [5,9,10–12,14–16].

In the presented analysis, the therapeutic program inclusion criteria did not take into account all the aforementioned factors because the Polish Drug Program was developed before 2011 when the knowledge of the subject matter was limited. It was also meant to simplify the procedure. In the context of OS and 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival among the patients in the whole population of 2072 subjects, the presented results are very good. The OS of 14.86 months for the males and 15.2 for the females, which amounts to about 450 days, is comparable only with the results for some selected subgroups of patients with BCLC stage B, Child-Pugh score A, with no extrahepatic spread and macroscopic vascular invasion, analyzed by other authors [5,9,12,16]. The median duration of the treatment for the patients qualified for the Polish therapeutic program was 111 days, and was 30 days longer than the period mentioned by Kaneko based on an analysis of 1065 subjects [11]. In a study on a population of 338 patients carried out by Ye et al, the OS and the median therapy duration were longer than in patients with Child-Pugh score A, as compared to patients in group B, and amounted to 320 and 147 days, respectively, versus 240 and 131.6 days, respectively [13]. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of the patients with no EHP and MVI treated with sorafenib in China were shorter than in the corresponding data presented in this paper, and were 55.6%, 29.6%, and 4.8%, respectively [10]. Japanese authors also revealed a lower 5-year survival rate than presented in the present study (7.7% vs 9.8% among males and 11.34% among females) [23].

Sorafenib extends the survival as compared to placebo in all patients with unresectable HCC; seeking the factors that improve its efficacy is justified from the clinical and economic point of view. The criteria implemented by the Polish payer, regarded by some as rigorous because they limit the access to treatment for patients with advanced disease, can be approached in different ways. Due to the increasing prices of HCC therapies, most countries carry out studies on the economic effectiveness of such therapies [6,24]. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib treatment is usually confirmed for Child-Pugh score patients and for patients in a good general condition; in more advanced cases, it is generally undetermined [24,25]. This is why the inclusion criteria for sorafenib treatment used in Poland (and in the United Kingdom) should be considered as valid, as the treatment cost is reimbursed by the state [26]. Moreover, the restriction of indications for treatment with sorafenib to the criteria mentioned above gives some assurance of optimal treatment results.

Conclusions

DECLARATION OF FIGURES AUTHENTICITY:

All figures submitted have been created by the authors who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.

References

1. Villanueva A, Hepatocellular carcinoma: N Engl J Med, 2019; 380(15); 1450-62

2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries: Cancer J Clin, 2018; 68(6); 394-424

3. Tapper EB, Parikh ND, Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: Observational study: BMJ, 2018; 362; k2817

4. Wasiak D, Pliszczyński J, Łągiewska B, The epidemiology of hepatocellular cancer in Poland: Clin Exp Hepatol, 2018; 4(1); 13-27

5. Bruix J, Cheng AL, Meinhardt G, Prognostic factors and predictors of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two phase III studies: J Hepatol, 2017; 67(5); 999-1008

6. Pollock RF, Colaone F, Guardiola L, A cost analysis of SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 resin microspheres versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in France, Italy, Spain and the UK: J Med Econ, 2020; 23(6); 593-602

7. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: N Engl J Med, 2008; 359(4); 378-90

8. Cheng A-L, Kang Y-K, Chen Z, Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase III randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: Lancet Oncol, 2009; 10(1); 25-34

9. Rovesti G, Orsi G, Kalliopi A, Impact of baseline characteristics on the overall survival of HCC patients treated with sorafenib: Ten years of experience: Gastrointest Tumors, 2019; 6(3–4); 92-107

10. Liu L, Zhang Q, Geng J, Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: Identifying optimal candidates: Ann Transl Med, 2020; 8(9); 583

11. Kaneko S, Ikeda K, Matsuzaki Y, Safety and effectiveness of sorafenib in Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in daily medical practice: Interim analysis of a prospective postmarketing all-patient surveillance study: J Gastroenterol, 2016; 51(10); 1011-21

12. Kudo M, Ikeda M, Takayama T, Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: A subgroup analysis of GIDEON: J Gastroenterol, 2016; 51(12); 1150-60

13. Ye S-L, Chen X, Yang J, Safety and efficacy of sorafenib therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Final outcome from the Chinese patient subset of the GIDEON study: Oncotarget, 2016; 7(6); 6639-48

14. Raoul J-L, Bruix J, Greten TF, Relationship between baseline hepatic status and outcome, and effect of sorafenib on liver function: SHARP trial subanalyses: J Hepatol, 2012; 56(5); 1080-88

15. King J, Palmer DH, Johnson P, Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular cancer – a UK audit: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 2017; 29(4); 256-62

16. Wörns MA, Koch S, Niederle IM, The impact of patient and tumour baseline characteristics on the overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Dig Liver Dis, 2013; 45(5); 408-13

17. Brzozowska M, Wierzba W, Śliwczyński A, Analysis of survival of patients treated with vemurafenib, ipilimumab and dabrafenib for advanced skin melanoma in daily clinical practice (Real-World Data): Retrospective analysis of patients treated under drug/reimbursement programmes in Poland in 2013–2016: Melanoma Res, 2018; 28(1); 52-55

18. Slama A, Śliwczyński A, Woźnica J, Impact of air pollution on hospital admissions with a focus on respiratory diseases: A time-series multi-city analysis: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2019; 26(17); 16998-7009

19. Nakano M, Kuromatsu R, Niizeki T, Primary treatment with molecular-targeted agents for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis: Hepatol Commun, 2020; 4(8); 1218-28

20. He M, Li Q, Zou R, Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin vs sorafenib alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A randomised clinical trial: JAMA Oncol, 2019; 5(7); 953-60

21. Ouyang G, Pan G, Xu H, Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis: J Clin Gastroenterol, 2020; 54(8); 675-81

22. Kudo M, Ueshima K, Yokosuka O, Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): A randomised, open label, phase 3 trial: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018; 3(6); 424-32

23. Kimura Y, Kaneko R, Yano Y, The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib in combination with TACE: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2020; 21(6); 1797-805

24. Likhtsup A, Parikh AL, Economic implications of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance and treatment: A guide for clinicians: Pharmacoeconomics, 2020; 38(1); 5-24

25. Parikh ND, Marshall VD, Singal AG, Survival and cost-effectiveness of sorafenib therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of the SEER-Medicare database: Hepatology, 2017; 65(1); 122-33

26. Schofield A: NICE backs Bayer–s Nexavar for routine use on NHS in England August 10, 2017 https://pharmafield.co.uk/pharma_news/nice-backs-bayers-nexavar-for-routine-use-on-nhs-in-england/

In Press

18 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research  

Sexual Dysfunction in Women After Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944136  

0:00

21 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

Potential Value of HSP90α in Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943049  

22 Feb 2024 : Review article  

Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943168  

23 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

A Study of 60 Patients with Low Back Pain to Compare Outcomes Following Magnetotherapy, Ultrasound, Laser, ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943732  

Most Viewed Current Articles

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research  

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

17 Jan 2024 : Review article  

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research  

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750