Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

30 June 2018 : Clinical Research  

Computed Tomographic Studies of Noncalcified Nodules Related to Neuroendocrine Lung Tumor Using 68Gallium-Tagged Somatostatin Variant for Improvement in Diagnosis: A Non-Experimental, Non-Randomized, Cross-Sectional Study

Ketian Li1A, Mingge Shen2E*, Hang Geng3BC, Linyi Zheng4D, Yujie Cao2FG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908545

Med Sci Monit 2018; 24: CLR4501-4509

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 18Fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- based positron-emission computed tomography (PET) has less specificity for noncalcified nodules (NNs). Somatostatin receptors affect the expression of normal and malignant cells. The purpose of the study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 68Gallium-tagged DOTA-octreotate (Ga-tDO) with that of FDG PET for diagnosis of newly detected and/or untreated NNs in lung cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 45 patients with lung cancer were included in the cross-sectional study and underwent Ga-tDO and FDG PET. We further confirmed observed outcomes by testing immune histochemical staining for subtype 2A of somatostatin receptor in a granuloma tissue array. The chi-square test was performed for sensitivity and specificity of predictive values among the 3 diagnostic modalities. McNemar’s test was performed to compare accuracy between Ga-tDO and FDG PET. Results were considered significant at 95% confidence level.

RESULTS: Ga-tDO had less sensitivity (69% vs. 89%) but more specificity (91% vs. 78%) than FDG PET. Ga-tDO and FDG PET were characterized as 36 and 6 and in 36 and 3 lesions as accurate and inaccurate, respectively. There was an insignificant difference between Ga-tDO and FDG PET regarding diagnostic accuracy (p=0.7). Dosimetry results showed that the lungs were one of the least critically affected organs.

CONCLUSIONS: Ga-tDO was more specific but less sensitive than FDG PET scanning and imaging.

Keywords: Contrast Media, Contrast Sensitivity, Tomography, Emission-Computed

Add Comment 0 Comments

Editorial

01 March 2024 : Editorial  

Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia

Dinah V. Parums

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944204

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204

0:00

In Press

18 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research  

Sexual Dysfunction in Women After Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944136  

0:00

21 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

Potential Value of HSP90α in Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943049  

22 Feb 2024 : Review article  

Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943168  

23 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

A Study of 60 Patients with Low Back Pain to Compare Outcomes Following Magnetotherapy, Ultrasound, Laser, ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943732  

Most Viewed Current Articles

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research  

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

17 Jan 2024 : Review article  

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research  

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750