09 June 2015 : Meta-Analysis
Comparison of High-Flexion and Conventional Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
Zhigang WangABCDEFG, Min WeiABDE, Qiang ZhangBCDE, Zhuo ZhangBDE, Yaofei CuiCDEDOI: 10.12659/MSM.893112
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:1679-1686
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for randomized trials and cohort studies comparing high-flexion with conventional knee implants. The heterogeneity across studies was examined by I2 and Cochran’s Q-tests. Then the overall weighted mean differences of range of motion (ROM) and knee functional scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 16 trials involving 2643 knees met our inclusion criteria. The results revealed that high-flexion implants were superior to conventional implants in the improvement of range of motion (weighted mean difference, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.63–4.22; p<0.0001). The clear advantage of high-flex PS (posterior stabilized) as well as high-flex CR (cruciate retaining) implants was found in ROM when compared to PS implants (2.73; 95% CI, 1.27–4.20; p=0.0003) and CR implants (3.24; 95% CI, 0.28–6.20; p=0.003), respectively. However, there was no difference in Knee Society Scores (0.42; 95% CI, –0.60–1.43; p=0.42), Knee Society function (0.37; 95% CI, –1.48–2.22; p=0.70) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores (0.26; 95% CI, –0.47–1.00; p=0.48) between high-flexion and conventional groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis revealed that high-flexion implants were superior to conventional implants in the improvement of ROM but not in functional outcome scores.
Keywords: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods, Knee Prosthesis - statistics & numerical data, Models, Statistical, PubMed
Editorial
01 May 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: First Regulatory Approval for Adoptive Cell Therapy with Autologous Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) – Lifileucel (Amtagvi)DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944927
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944927
In Press
12 Mar 2024 : Database Analysis
Risk Factors of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Population-Based Study: Results from SHIP-TREND-1 (St...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943140
12 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Preoperative Blood Transfusion Requirements for Hemorrhoidal Severe Anemia: A Retrospective Study of 128 Pa...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943126
12 Mar 2024 : Clinical Research
Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and 3 (TIMP-3) as New Markers of Acute Kidney Injury Afte...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943500
12 Mar 2024 : Review article
Optimizing Behçet Uveitis Management: A Review of Personalized Immunosuppressive StrategiesMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943240
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952