Logo Medical Science Monitor Basic Research

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Basic Research Logo Medical Science Monitor Basic Research Logo Medical Science Monitor Basic Research

30 April 2015: Hypothesis  

Molluscs as Models for Translational Medicine

Fabio Tascedda AE , Davide Malagoli E , Alice Accorsi F , Giovanna Rigillo B , Johanna M.C. Blom D , Enzo Ottaviani AEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.894221

Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2015; 21:96-99

0 Comments

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper describes the advantages of adopting a molluscan model for studying the biological basis of some central nervous system pathologies affecting humans. In particular, we will focus on the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis, which is already the subject of electrophysiological studies related to learning and memory, as well as ecotoxicological studies. The genome of L. stagnalis has been sequenced and annotated but the gene characterization has not yet been performed. We consider the characterization of the gene networks that play crucial roles in development and functioning of the central nervous system in L. stagnalis, an important scientific development that comparative biologists should pursue. This important effort would add a new experimental model to the limited number of invertebrates already used in studies of translational medicine, the discipline that seeks to improve human health by taking advantage of knowledge collected at the molecular and cellular levels in non-human organisms.

Keywords: Central Nervous System - physiopathology, Gene Regulatory Networks - genetics, Lymnaea - physiology, Models, Animal, Translational Medical Research - trends

Background

In recent decades, basic and applied biomedical research has made huge progress and provided a large amount of information. Unfortunately, these great efforts and knowledge gained have not been quickly followed by the desired and expected therapeutic results [1]. This has great significance for several diseases affecting the central nervous system for which, at present, there is no effective treatment (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia). Traditionally, the process of drug discovery begins with the identification of one or more target proteins that are potentially implicated in a specific human disease. The identification of target proteins is followed by the search for one or more chemicals that can alter the function of the target proteins. This last phase consists of the screening of many chemical compounds to evaluate their effects in the animal models usually used for studying the pathology of interest. The process of identifying a single promising compound among thousands of candidates may take a long time and tens of millions of dollars, with no guarantee of success. The animal models used most frequently in this screening process are small mammals (i.e., rats and mice) and primates. This approach, which is not always effective, led to many protests and fueled much scientific, ethical, economic, and social discussion, as well as leading to profound changes in the law associated with ethical restrictions in animal experiments. The high cost of these studies and the increasing difficulties in obtaining permits for experimentation prompted researchers to look for other strategies. Many researchers have attempted to solve the problem by using in vitro cell systems that have lower operating costs and higher speed in collecting data. Unfortunately, the obtained results were often limited and inconclusive in elucidating the basis of diseases and identifying effective therapeutic strategies [2]. On the basis of these considerations, the need to identify alternative and reliable models that have fewer ethical restrictions is both important and urgent.

Despite the many advances in biological and biomedical sciences, the understanding of incurable diseases remains inadequate. The disparity between the huge amount of information on the molecular and cell biology and the modest capacity to intervene in important human neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease may appear incongruous. Researchers have in part clarified how cells work individually but they also clearly showed how extremely sophisticated and complex are the processes that allow the survival or alter the proper functioning of multicellular organisms [1]. In this complex picture more effective and ethical approaches in biomedical research are required, exceeding the practical and conceptual limitations of experiments on mammals and on cell cultures.

Development of Alternatives to Mammalian Models

The evolutionary process that prompted the diversity among species also promoted the conservation of numerous key physiological processes that are well preserved across species, including humans [3,4]. Unlike mammals, invertebrates frequently have short generation times, numerous offspring, and can be more easily experimentally manipulated. If detailed genetic information is available, powerful genetic tools allow a fine dissection of the metabolic pathways, allowing to understand the basic mechanisms of physiology and pathology in the analyzed organism. On this basis, it is not surprising that some of the most advanced research on invertebrates [5] in the biomedical field provide a quick and efficient way to develop treatments for human diseases [6]. Today, the most common and best characterized invertebrate models are the insect Drosophila melanogaster and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. These organisms are valid alternative models for the study of the biological basis of many processes, especially in human diseases, and open up interesting perspectives concerning both the validation of the mechanism of action of existing drugs and the preclinical studies of drugs in development. However, their anatomical features, the peculiarities of the genome [7], and the very short life cycle limit their effectiveness in studies involving aging and neuro-degeneration or chronic diseases. Aside the two most diffused invertebrate models, other invertebrates have been the subjects of basic and applied biomedical researches. For instance, the sea squirt Ciona intestinalis is a chordate and a useful model of neuroendocrinology experiments. This ascidian has many hormones (i.e., gonadotropin-releasing hormone, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor) analogues to those found in higher animals [8]. The small genomes of insects such as Apis mellifera, Acyrthosiphon pisum and Bombyx mori, allow the utilization of these animals as models in studies on DNA methylation in order to understand the general relevance of this important epigenetic mechanism [9–11]. It is well known that the tumor suppressor gene p53 is one of the best studied genes in human cancer research [12]. In this context, the discovery in the bivalve Mya arenaria of human homologues for p53 (Map53) and p73 (Map73) genes makes this mollusc a model of interest in the study of human cancer [13].

New Directions of Translational Medicine

Invertebrates are a valid alternative model in the study and characterization of human disease processes and in the discovery and development of new drug therapies. Invertebrate models have many advantages compared to mammalian models, including significant experimental efficiency due to the reduced time needed for experiments and the low costs required for their care. Moreover, conservation of fundamental gene networks in invertebrate models allows researchers to benefit from projects focused on humans. The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project (www.encodeproject.org) has provided, for the first time, many functional and regulatory elements in the genome (e.g., protein, RNA, and networking genes, including their adjustment), that are the basis of metabolic pathways and processes, especially in humans. The availability of such data has had a significant impact on other model organisms, leading to the modENCODE project (www.modencode.org) aimed at identifying the functional elements and gene networks in D. melanogaster and C. elegans genomes [14–16]. Thanks to modENCODE it is possible to improve knowledge about gene functional annotations in other organisms whose genomes have been completely sequenced and annotated. Among them, attention should be paid to the genome of the gastropod mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis widely used to study the molecular mechanisms related to learning and memory as well as neurodegenerative diseases [17,18]. Numerous studies suggest that L. stagnalis could be a good and innovative model in biomedical research for the analysis of the genetic and molecular basis of human central nervous system diseases and for the identification, characterization, and development of new, safe, and effective therapeutic strategies. In 1997, an interesting review by Kemenes [19] reported the presence in L. stagnalis motor neurons of signaling pathways associated with specific behaviors similar to other invertebrate and vertebrate models. Recently, neuronal aging research in Lymnaea demonstrated that its neurons and its behaviorally characterized neuronal circuits show mechanisms analogous to that described in the etiology of age-associated dysfunctions and diseases of human and mammalian brains [20]. Although quite distant evolutionarily from humans, molluscs have already been proposed as models for translational medicine (e.g., in studies on human cancer) [21–23].

Compared to the established models D. melanogaster and C. elegans, Lymnaea has many benefits and is potentially important as a model in biomedical research due to the large size of its neurons, data from electrophysiological studies, and its already characterized neuronal circuits. Lymnaea also offers remarkable convenience, a large amount of biological material that could be molecularly and morphologically analyzed, and the possibility of performing behavioral tests [14]. More importantly, while D. melanogaster and C. elegans have a life cycle that lasts 2–3 weeks, Lymnaea develops in 2 weeks inside the eggs and then has an average life span of 9–12 months. This last factor becomes particularly interesting and useful in studies on chronic human pathologies, especially neurodegenerative diseases. The direct development and longevity of L. stagnalis allow the identification of age “stages” that could be connected to age-related modifications that may involve genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms, which usually take time to manifest their effects (as is also the case in human diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and other neurodegenerative diseases).

Conclusions

Because of historical, economic, and cultural/ethical advances, the use of mammals in biomedical research is increasingly expensive and restricted. This has created a pressing demand for alternative models that are less expensive but still effective to study the basis of human physiology and pathology. This now seems possible thanks to the great advances in comparative genomics that made possible the use of animal models that are cheap, simple, and easy to handle but in some situations just as effective as mammalian models due to the availability of their genomes and molecular tools important in analyzing gene networks. In this context, the neurobiological and genetic characterization of L. stagnalis may offer to translational medicine a powerful new tool to study age-related diseases of the nervous system and identifying new molecular targets for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. In addition to the scientific implications, such a model has great ethical and economic value. Invertebrate models would limit as much as possible the use of several mammalian models, that would be involved only for the necessary validation of the results obtained from invertebrates. This would reduce by several orders of magnitude the costs of numerous pharmacological studies.

References

1. Alberts B, Model organisms and human health: Science, 2010; 330; 1724, pmid: 21177975

2. Viscomi C, Bottani E, Zeviani M, Emerging concepts in the therapy of mitochondrial disease: Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015; 1847; 544-57, pmid: 25766847

3. Ottaviani E, Malagoli D, Franceschi C: Trends Immunol, 2007; 28; 497-502, pmid: 17962071

4. Ottaviani E, The importance of studying invertebrate immune-neuroendocrine functions: Inv Surv J, 2014; 11; 1-3

5. Ottaviani E, Accorsi A, Rigillo G: Brain Res, 2013; 1537; 18-26, pmid: 24041774

6. Harel I, Benayoun BA, Machado B, A platform for rapid exploration of aging and diseases in a naturally short-lived vertebrate: Cell, 2015; 160; 1013-26, pmid: 25684364

7. Pandey UB, Nichols CD: Pharm Rev, 2011; 63; 411-36, pmid: 21415126

8. Sherwood NM, Tello JA, Roch GJ: Comp Biochem Physiol, 2006; 144A; 254-71

9. Wang Y, Jorda M, Jones PL, Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect: Science, 2006; 314; 645-47, pmid: 17068262

10. Walsh TK, Brisson JA, Robertson HM: Insect Mol Biol, 2010; 19(Suppl); 215-28, pmid: 20482652

11. Lyko F, Maleszka R, Insects as innovative models for functional studies of DNA methylation: Trends Genet, 2011; 27; 127-31, pmid: 21288591

12. Vaughan C, Pearsall I, Yeudall A, p53: its mutations and their impact on transcription: Subcell Biochem, 2014; 85; 71-90, pmid: 25201189

13. Kelley ML, Winge P, Heaney JD: Oncogene, 2001; 20; 748-58, pmid: 11314008

14. Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Ren B, Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach: Nature Rev Genet, 2010; 11; 476-86, pmid: 20531367

15. Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL: Science, 2010; 330; 1775-87, pmid: 21177976

16. The modENCODE Consortium et al: Science, 2010; 330; 1787-97, pmid: 21177974

17. Murakami J, Okada R, Sadamoto H: J Neurosci, 2013; 33; 371-83, pmid: 23283349

18. Takigami S, Sunada H, Lukowiak K, Sakakibara M: Neurosci Lett, 2013; 555; 149-53, pmid: 24076143

19. Kemenes G: Gen Pharmacol, 1997; 29; 7-15, pmid: 9195188

20. Hermann PM, Watson SN, Wildering WC, Phospholipase A2 – nexus of aging, oxidative stress, neuronal excitability, and functional decline of the aging nervous system? Insights from a snail model system of neuronal aging and age-associated memory impairment: Front Genet, 2014; 5; 419, pmid: 25538730

21. Tascedda F, Ottaviani E, Tumors in invertebrates: Inv Surv J, 2014; 11; 197-203

22. De Vico G, Carella F, Tumors in invertebrates: molluscs as an emerging animal model for human cancer: Inv Surv J, 2015; 12; 19-21

23. Stefano GB, Mantione KJ, Casares FM, Kream RM: Inv Surv J, 2015; 12; 22-28

Most Viewed Current Articles

13 Apr 2020 : Original article   19,586

Outcome of 24 Weeks of Combined Schroth and Pilates Exercises on Cobb Angle, Angle of Trunk Rotation, Chest...

DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.920449

Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e920449

20 Apr 2018 : Original article   17,466

Brain Training Games Enhance Cognitive Function in Healthy Subjects

DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.909022

Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2018; 24:63-69

23 Jul 2016 : Review article   10,353

Cardiac Hypertrophy: An Introduction to Molecular and Cellular Basis

DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.900437

Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:75-79

10 Aug 2020 : Clinical Research   9,788

Effects of Cognitive Task Training on Dynamic Balance and Gait of Patients with Stroke: A Preliminary Rando...

DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.925264

Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e925264

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor Basic Research eISSN: 2325-4416
Medical Science Monitor Basic Research eISSN: 2325-4416