25 October 2016: Animal Studies
Evaluation of the Maintained Effect of 3% Hypertonic Saline Solution in an Animal Model of Intracranial Hypertension
Leonardo M. Sousa, Jr. ABCDEF , Almir F. de Andrade ABCDFG , Alessandro R. Belon ABCDE , Matheus S. Soares ABEF , Robson Luis Amorim ABEF , Jose Pinhata Otochi ABEFG , Manoel J. Teixeira ABEFG , Wellingson S. Paiva ABCDEFG
DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.899661
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:123-127
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current clinical treatment methods for refractory intracranial hypertension include elevation of the decubitus, ventilation adjustment, and use of hypertonic solutions such as hypertonic saline and mannitol solutions. Previous studies have shown that hypertonic solutions are particularly effective. Although several concentrations of saline solution have been proposed, a 3% solution is the most widely used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the maintained efficacy of a 3% hypertonic saline solution in an experimental model of intracranial hypertension.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A porcine model of reversible intracranial hypertension was created by inserting a balloon catheter into the brain parenchyma, which was inflated and deflated to simulate intracranial hypertension and its surgical correction. The experiment included 3 groups of animals (A, B, and C) with different balloon inflation volumes. In group B, balloons were inflated 2 times to simulate reexpansion. A 20 mL/kg bolus of 3% saline solution was infused using a pump 90 minutes after the start of balloon inflation, and the effects of intracranial pressure were evaluated 60 minutes after infusion.
RESULTS: No increases outside of the normal range were observed in mean serum sodium concentrations (p=0.09). In addition, we identified no differences within each group in serum sodium levels measured during hypertonic saline infusion (p=0.21). No significant reductions in intracranial pressure were observed in any of the 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Bolus infusion of 3% hypertonic saline solution with the aid of a pump does not significantly reduce intracranial pressure in an animal model of intracranial hypertension.
Keywords: Intracranial Hypertension, Intracranial Pressure, Saline Solution, Hypertonic
Background
Elevated and refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from acute hemorrhagic brain injury leads to tissue changes, cerebral ischemia, hernias, and damage to vital brain structures. The use of osmotically active substances is a fundamental component of neurocritical care protocols and is recommended by current guidelines for the treatment of intracranial hypertension [1–4]. Mannitol and hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) are most commonly used and have gained wide acceptance, despite the lack of high-quality clinical studies demonstrating their effectiveness [5,6]. In the absence of definitive evidence of an optimal treatment, there is significant variation in both the choices and usage of such agents [7]. Methods of HSS administration vary considerably, including bolus infusion of a 2% or 3% solution and continuous or bolus infusion of 5%, 7.5%, or 23.4% solutions [8–11]. Results of a recent meta-analysis have suggested that HSS (3%) may be more effective than mannitol for controlling sharp increases in ICP [12]; however, no previous studies have evaluated its long-term capacity to control ICP. In our experience, continuous infusion of 3% HSS is effective in reducing ICP during the treatment of intracranial hypertension. Several possible mechanisms may account for the reduction of intracranial hypertension by treatment with HSS [13–15]. Accordingly, this study analyzed the effects of 3% saline solution infusion 1 hour after simulation of ICP elevation in an animal model of intracranial hypertension.
Material and Methods
ANIMALS:
Twenty-nine hybrid pigs of the Landrace, Duroc, and Pietrain breeds (approximately 20 kg each) were used in this study, under general anesthesia, duly assisted with ventilation and hemodynamic monitoring. Of these, 1 animal was excluded because of anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 6.7 (only animals with hemoglobin levels greater than 9.0 were used), and 1 animal was excluded because of hyponatremia, which may influence ICP and therefore compromise our results. The study procedures were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee (number 0520/09) and by the Department of Neurology (Faculty of Medicine) at the University of São Paulo. All experiments were carried out according to the ethical principles for the use of laboratory animals adopted by this institution. We attest that the animals were not subjected to conditions of suffering or pain in any step of the experiment.
ANIMAL PREPARATION, ANESTHESIA, AND MONITORING:
The pigs were subjected to 12 h of fasting with free access to water until 1 h before the experiment. Prior to anesthesia induction, ketamine (5 mg/kg; Ketamin-S; Cristália®, Itapira, Brazil) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg; Dormire; Cristália®) were administered intramuscularly. After 15 min, the marginal ear vein was catheterized with a 20- or 22-gauge Insyte vascular catheter (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). After venous access was established, anesthesia was induced intravenously (i.v.) using propofol (5 mg/kg; Provive 1%; Claris, Ahmedabad, India). Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (3 mg/kg/h), and analgesia was maintained with fentanyl (Fentanest; Cristália) at a starting dose of 5 μg/kg, followed by continuous i.v. infusion at 0.4 μg/kg/min. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved by administration of pancuronium (Pancuron; Cristália) at a starting dose of 0.1 mg/kg i.v., followed by continuous i.v. infusion at 0.02 mg/kg/h. Animals also received an initial i.v. infusion of saline solution (20 mL/kg, 0.9% NaCl) to compensate for volume loss due to fasting, and received supportive fluid therapy with 0.9% NaCl at a rate of 5 mL/kg/h throughout the procedure.
After endotracheal intubation with a Portex 6.0 mm tube (Smiths Medical, Rockland, Massachusetts, USA), the animals received volume-cycled controlled mechanical ventilation (Dixtal 5010 ventilator; Dixtal Biomédica, São Paulo, Brazil) with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.50, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O. Ventilation parameters were adjusted to maintain the partial pressure of CO2 between 35 and 45 mm Hg, the partial pressure of O2 between 100 and 150 mm Hg, and the pH between 7.35 and 7.45. In order to monitor and maintain sufficient ventilation, both the final pressure of expired CO2 and peripheral hemoglobin saturation were continuously measured using pulse oximetry. The right femoral artery was catheterized to monitor the mean invasive blood pressure. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed using 0.3 mL samples collected at the beginning of the procedure in order to establish ventilation parameters and after the interventions described below. Hemodynamic data were collected using a multi-parameter monitor (Monitor Portal DX 2020; Dixtal).
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE:
An intracerebral expansive process was simulated in the right hemisphere. A frontotemporal incision was performed, and bone trepanning was performed on the right hemisphere 1 cm lateral to the sagittal suture and 1 cm anterior to the coronal suture. A NEUROVENT-P intraparenchymal catheter with a multisensor that analyzes ICP and brain temperature (Raumedic, Helmbrechts, Germany) was inserted into the white matter of the right frontal lobe at a depth of approximately 10 mm. Right posterior temporal trepanning and insertion of a NEURODUR-P ICP epidural monitoring catheter (Raumedic®) was also performed. Bone trepanning 1 cm lateral to the sagittal suture and 1 cm posterior to the coronal suture (3 mm in diameter) allowed the insertion of an 8 French pediatric urethral catheter at a 20° lateral inclination and a depth of 2 cm, targeting the right frontal subcortical white matter. Balloon inflation was performed over a 15 min period using an infusion pump (B Braun Medical, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA). This fluid system was tested prior to insertion. A hypertonic solution of 3% NaCl (5.3 mL/kg) was infused 30 min after the start of the final balloon inflation. The effects on ICP control was measured 60 minutes after saline solution infusion
The 27 animals included in the study were divided into 3 groups (n=9 per group). In group A, the balloons were inflated to 4 mL in order to simulate mild to moderate hypertension. In group B, the balloons were initially inflated to 4 mL and were inflated by an additional 3 mL after 1 h, simulating expansion. In group C, an intracranial hematoma model with balloon with a volume of 7 mL was performed. The animals were sacrificed at the end of the experiment by means of an intravenous dose of propofol (20 mg/kg) and fentanyl (10 mg/kg), followed by 40 mL of 19.1% potassium chloride solution. After the experiment, the animals were placed in vivarium plastic bags with labels clearly identifying their origin and content and the researcher in charge. They were then transported for incineration.
SAMPLE SIZE:
We used a convenience sample; and as this study was exploratory (there’s no study, as far as we know, that used this model to evaluate the use of hypertonic solutions), we defined a total of 30 pigs as being sufficient for a first analysis.
STATISTICAL SECTION:
Continuous variables were reported as means and standard deviations. To evaluate the ICP following the interventions (balloon inflation and hypertonic saline infusion) we used a paired student’s t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test according to normality of the data with significance at p=0.05.
Results
Twenty-seven animals were included in the study (14 female and 13 male), with 9 in each experimental group. The mean weight of the animals was 19.74±1.12 kg, with no differences between groups. All animals included in the study completed the experiments.
ICP measurements in each group confirmed the effectiveness of the intracranial hypertension model. In group A, balloon inflation to a volume of 4 mL using an infusion pump generated a moderate increase in ICP. We also observed an increase in ICP in group B, which represented an early reexpansion model of intracranial hematoma. In group C, there was a marked increase in ICP that remained higher when compared to the other two groups. In the evaluation of increased ICP, it was confirmed that the model was suitable to generate an increase in ICP and that the increases in the mean ICP between three groups were statistically significant (p<0.001) (Figure 1).
We observed no increases in the mean serum sodium concentration beyond the normal range (p=0.09). In addition, no differences were identified in the serum sodium level measured during HSS infusion within each group (p=0.21). There was no effect of significant pressure reduction in any of the 3 groups (Figure 2). Group C showed an increase in ICP with saline infusion; however, this increase was immediate but not statistically significant and therefore did not represent a rebound effect.
Discussion
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:
This study has some limitations. First of all, the concentration and the type of infusion vary among studies. Also, the use of 3% hypertonic saline as a continuous infusion may not be the ideal dose to cause a decrease of ICP in our model. Moreover, we did not check serum osmolarity after HSS infusion. Additionally, the mechanism of action of hypertonic saline has been classically attributed to reduction of the water content of the interstitial space in a broken blood-brain barrier, a fact that could partially justify our results. However, we believe that the area surrounding the balloon would cause rupture of axons and the blood-brain barrier, causing immediate inflammatory changes that contribute to ICP increase and, consequently, are amenable to be treated with hypertonic saline. Considering all these points together, the present results should be analyzed with caution. However, this experimental study was done in a controlled environment where was possible to identify a consistent increase of ICP over the different groups, showing, at least, that this model could be used to evaluate the different types of clinical and surgical interventions to reduce ICP.
Conclusions
This study identified a consistent increase of ICP according to the different volumes of balloon inflation, showing that this model may be used to evaluate clinical and surgical treatments to decrease ICP. However, we did not see any effect of HSS following balloon inflation in any of the three groups.
References
1. Helmy A, Vizcaychipi M, Gupta AK, Traumatic brain injury: Intensive care management: Br J Anaesth, 2007; 99; 32-42, pmid: 17556349
2. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. II. Hyperosmolar therapy: J Neurotrauma, 2007; 24; S14-20, pmid: 17511539
3. Bederson JB, Connolly ES, Batjer HHAmerican Heart Association, Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association: Stroke, 2009; 40; 994-1025, pmid: 19164800
4. Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC, Anderson CAmerican Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association: Stroke, 2010; 41; 2108-29, pmid: 20651276
5. Bhardwaj A, Osmotherapy in neurocritical care: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2007; 7; 513-21, pmid: 17999898
6. Wakai A, McCabe A, Roberts I, Schierhout G, Mannitol for acute traumatic brain injury: Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; 8; CD001049
7. Hays AN, Lazaridis C, Neyens R, Osmotherapy: Use among neurointensivists: Neurocrit Care, 2011; 14; 222-28, pmid: 21153930
8. Tyagi R, Donaldson K, Loftus CM, Jallo J, Hypertonic saline: A clinical review: Neurosurg Rev, 2007; 30; 277-89, pmid: 17574484
9. Hauer EM, Stark D, Staykov D, Early continuous hypertonic saline infusion in patients with severe cerebrovascular disease: Crit Care Med, 2011; 39; 1766-72, pmid: 21494103
10. Vialet R, Albanèse J, Thomachot L, Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol: Crit Care Med, 2003; 31; 1683-87, pmid: 12794404
11. Koenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL, Reversal of transtentorial herniation with hypertonic saline: Neurology, 2008; 70; 1023-29, pmid: 18272864
12. Kamel H, Navi BB, Nakagawa K, Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: Crit Care Med, 2011; 39; 554-59, pmid: 21242790
13. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Use of hypertonic saline solutions in treatment of cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension: Crit Care Med, 2000; 28; 3301-13, pmid: 11008996
14. Bhardwaj A, Ulatowski JA, Hypertonic saline solutions in brain injury: Curr Opin Crit Care, 2004; 10; 126-31, pmid: 15075723
15. Mortimer DS, Jancik J, Administering hypertonic saline to patients with severe traumatic brain injury: J Neurosci Nurs, 2006; 38; 142-46, pmid: 16817665
16. Zornow MH, Hypertonic saline as a safe and efficacious treatment of intracranial hypertension: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 1996; 8; 175-77, pmid: 8829566
17. Qureshi AI, Wilson DA, Hanley DF, Traystman RJ, No evidence for an ischemic penumbra in massive experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: Neurology, 1999; 52; 266-72, pmid: 9932942
18. White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B, The use of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury: Anesth Analg, 2006; 102; 1836-46, pmid: 16717334
19. Thongrong C, Kong N, Govindarajan B, Current purpose and practice of hypertonic saline in neurosurgery: A review of the literature: World Neurosurg, 2014; 82; 1307-18, pmid: 23402866
20. Li Y, Li Z, Li M, Efficacy and safety of continuous micro-pump infusion of 3% hypertonic saline combined with furosemide to control elevated intracranial pressure: Med Sci Monit, 2015; 21; 1752-8, pmid: 26082293
21. Nelson CG, Elta T, Bannister J, Severe traumatic brain injury: A case report: Am J Case Rep, 2016; 17; 186-91, pmid: 27005826
22. Nau R, Osmotherapy for elevated intracranial pressure: A critical reappraisal: Clin Pharmacokinet, 2000; 38; 23-40, pmid: 10668857
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Apr 2020 : Original article 19,586
Outcome of 24 Weeks of Combined Schroth and Pilates Exercises on Cobb Angle, Angle of Trunk Rotation, Chest...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.920449
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e920449
20 Apr 2018 : Original article 17,466
Brain Training Games Enhance Cognitive Function in Healthy SubjectsDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.909022
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2018; 24:63-69
23 Jul 2016 : Review article 10,353
Cardiac Hypertrophy: An Introduction to Molecular and Cellular BasisDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.900437
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:75-79
10 Aug 2020 : Clinical Research 9,788
Effects of Cognitive Task Training on Dynamic Balance and Gait of Patients with Stroke: A Preliminary Rando...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.925264
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e925264






