16 December 2016: Molecular Biology
Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) Regulates Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α-Induced) Aquaporin-2 (AQP2) Expression in Renal Medullary Collecting Duct Cells Through Inhibiting the NF-κB Pathway
Qinqin Lin ABCDEFG 1*, Yuanwen Geng BCDE 1, Shuaishuai Lin BCDEF 2, Zhenjun Tian ABCDEFG 3
DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.901909
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:165-174
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aquaporin-2 (AQP2) plays a major role in water reabsorption in the renal collecting duct, and is involved in a variety of renal disease. Recent studies have indicate that sirtuin1 (SIRT1) exerts renoprotective properties against kidney diseases. This study aimed to determine the potential role of SIRT1 in AQP2 expression induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and to disclose the underlying mechanism in renal inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting were respectively identified mRNA and protein expression. Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the localization of AQP2. Small-interfering RNA (siRNA) was carried out for mechanism study.
RESULTS: Results showed that AQP2 was clearly increased in the plasma membrane and decreased in the cytoplasm of IMCD cells treated with AVP. TNF-α treatment in IMCD cells significantly reduced SIRT1 and AQP2 expression, and increased acetylated NF-κBp65 protein level in time- and concentration-dependent manners. Moreover, SIRT1 overexpression or the activator SRT1720 augmented AQP2 expression and reduced the acetylation of NF-κBp65, which was reversed by SIRT1 siRNA or the inhibitors Ex527 and sirtinol in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells. Knockdown of NF-κBp65 or NF-κBp65 inhibition by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) enhanced AQP2 expression in IMCD cells exposed to TNF-α. Importantly, knockdown of NF-kBp65 augmented the up-regulation of SIRT1 on AQP2 expression in IMCD cells induced by TNF-α.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that SIRT1 increases AQP2 expression in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells via the NF-κB-dependent signalling pathway, which might provide novel insight to understanding the renoprotective effects of SIRT1 in kidney diseases.
Keywords: Aquaporin 2, Kidney Tubules, Collecting
Background
Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a member of the evolutionarily conserved family of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase, is implicated in a wide range of cellular functions involved in the pathogenesis of diseases including cardiovascular diseases, kidney disease [1,2]. Recently, emerging evidences has suggested that SIRT1 is a novel target for prevention of kidney diseases [2–4]. Kidney-specific overexpression of SIRT1 rescues cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in transgenic mice [5], while SIRT1 knockout in diabetes and AKI mice shows aggravation of renal changes occurring [6,7]. It is well known that AKI is characterized by structural alterations in renal tubule epithelia, and concomitant with impaired urinary concentration and sodium and water reabsorption [8,9]. Aquaporins (AQPs; a family of water channel proteins), especially AQP2, plays a major role in water reabsorption in the renal inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD). AQP2 has been shown to be decreased markedly in the proximal tubule and IMCD in rats with AKI induced by ischemia/reperfusion injury or sepsis [9,10]. However, there is no direct evidence to demonstrate the relationship between SIRT1 and AQP2. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore the possible effect of SIRT1 on AQP2 expression in renal IMCD cells induced by TNF-α. Furthermore, it’s well accepted that the renoprotective properties of SIRT1 are closely related to the regulation of nuclear transcription factor (NF-κB) [11,12]. It has been shown that NF-κB is involved in AQP2 expression in renal collecting duct principal cells [13], in mouse cortical collecting duct cells [14], and kidneys of rats with sepsis-induced acute renal failure [15]. So, we also investigated whether NF-κB pathway contributed to the regulation of SIRT1 on AQP2 expression in renal IMCD cells.
Material and Methods
REAGENTS AND CELL TRANSFECTION:
TNF-α was ordered from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). SRT1720 and Ex527 were obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Sirtinol and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). SIRT1 siRNA, NF-κBp65 siRNA, and the scrambled negative controls were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1(+) was sponsored by Dr. Bu. To overexpress SIRT1, the cells cultured in 6-well plates were transfected with recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1(+)-SIRT1. To knockdown endogenous SIRT1 and NF-κB, IMCD cells were transfected with 100 nM SIRT1 siRNA or NF-κBp65 siRNA. Transfection was carried by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection to assess the expression of SIRT1 or NF-κBp65.
CELL CULTURE:
Primary cultures enriched in IMCD cells were prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats (120–140 g body wt), as previously described [16]. All experimental protocols were approved by the Review Committee for the Use of Human or Animal Subjects of Yanshan University. Both kidneys were rapidly removed from rats under light diethyl ether inhalation anaesthesia. After kidney excision, the renal inner medullas including papilla were rapidly removed, cut into small pieces, and digested in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase and 2.2 mg/ml collagenase type CLS-II at 37°C under continuous agitation for 90 min. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed in prewarmed culture medium (High glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM urea, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% ultroser, 500 μM DBcAMP, 20 U/ml nystatin and 0.25 μg/ml gentamicin). The IMCD cell suspension was then seeded in collagen type IV-coated chamber slides for immunocytochemical analysis or in a 60-mm culture dish for immunoblot analysis. After 24 h, wash cells twice with 600 mosmol hypertonic culture medium (High glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 100 mM NaCl and 100 mM urea) and add fresh medium at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air for 3 days and then in medium without DBcAMP and nystatin for 24 h before starting the experiment on day 6.
IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE STAINING:
IMCD cells were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde-PBS for 30 min. The fixed cell membrane was fenestrated with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min, and then blocked with 5% goat serum for 30 min. The cells were incubated with polyclonal anti-rabbit AQP2 antibody (sc-28629, 1: 100, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C, and then incubated with a TRITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibody (1: 100 dilutions) for 2 h. After the nuclei were stained with 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) dye (1: 800 dilutions) for 15 min, the stained cells were investigated using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
WESTERN BLOT ANALYSIS:
Cell samples were collected and lysed at 4°C in RIPA buffer with the protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The protein was separated on 12% SDS PAGE gels and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h and then incubated at 4°C overnight with rabbit polyclonal anti-SIRT1 (sc-15404, 1: 500, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-AQP2 (sc-28629, 1: 100, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-acetyl-NF-κBp65 (Lys 310) (Ac-p65) (ab19870, 1: 400, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK), anti-NF-κBp65 (ab16502, 1: 400, Abcam), and anti-GAPDH (TDY052, 1: 5000, TDY biotech, Beijing, China) respectively. GAPDH was used as internal standard. Then, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (S004, 1: 10000, TDY biotech) for 45 min. Protein signals were subsequently detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, USA).
QUANTITATIVE REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (QRT-PCR):
Total RNA was isolated from IMCD cells using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Foster, CA, USA). Complementary DNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa) on a Bio-Rad CFX connect real-time system (Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All primers were as follows: SIRT1 forward 5′-CAGTTCCAGCCATCTCTGTG-3′and reverse 5′-GCAACCTGC TCCAAGGTATC-3′; AQP2 forward 5′-TTCCTTCGAGCTGCCTTCTA-3′and reverse 5′-TTGTGGAGAGCATTGACAGC-3′; GAPDH forward 5′-ACAGCAACAGGGTGG TGGAC-3′and reverse 5′-TTTGAGGGTGCAGCGAACTT-3′. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Quantification of relative gene expression was calculated with 2−ΔΔCt method as described by the manufacturer.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA, followed by a post hoc test.
Results
TNF-α DECREASED AQP2 EXPRESSION IN IMCD CELLS:
AQP2 immunofluorescent labeling was largely dispersed along the cytoplasm of primary cultured IMCD cells in the absence of 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (dDAVP) stimulation in control group. In contrast, treatment with 100 nM AVP for 30 clearly increased the AQP2 expression in the plasma membrane and decreased it in the cytoplasm (Figure 1A), indicating that the IMCD cells were correctly cultured.
To study the effect of TNF-α on AQP2 expression, the IMCD cells were treated with TNF-α (10, 20 and 40 μg/L) for 24 h, and the expression of AQP2 protein and mRNA was determined by Western blot analysis and qRT-PCR, respectively. The results showed that TNF-α significantly decreased the expression of AQP2 mRNA and protein in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1B, 1C). We further investigate the time courses of AQP2 stimulated with TNF-α (20 μg/L) for 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. As shown in Figure 1D,1E, TNF-α time-dependently reduced the expression of AQP2 mRNA and protein in IMCD cells.
TNF-α DOWN-REGULATED SIRT1 EXPRESSION IN IMCD CELLS:
We next investigated the effect of TNF-α on SIRT1 expression in IMCD cells, the IMCD cells were treated with TNF-α (10, 20 and 40 μg/L) for 24 h. The results showed that TNF-α down-regulated SIRT1 expression at protein and mRNA level in IMCD cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2A, 2B). To study the time courses of SIRT1 expression, the IMCD cells were treated with TNF-α (20 μg/L) for 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. The results revealed that TNF-α inhibited the protein and mRNA expression of SIRT1 in a time-dependent manner (Figure 2C, 2D).
SIRT1 INCREASED AQP2 EXPRESSION IN TNF-α-INDUCED IMCD CELLS:
To identify the role of SIRT1 in the expression of AQP2 in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells, we overexpressed the expressions of SIRT1 in IMCD cells. After treatment with the SIRT1 activator SRT1720 (10 μM) or the pcDNA3.1(+)-SIRT1 plasmid, increases in SIRT1 expression were observed in IMCD cells compared with the control group (Figure 3A, 3E, 3F). Then the IMCD cells were pretreated with SRT1720 for 1 h or pcDNA3.1(+)-SIRT1 for 48 h, and then stimulated with TNF-α (20μg/L) for 24 h. SIRT1 activator SRT1720 obviously increased the expression of SIRT1 and AQP2 in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells (Figure 3B–3D). Overexpression of SIRT1 is further supported the results by inducing expression of AQP2 compared with the TNF-α group (Figure 3G, 3H). Then, we silenced the expression of SIRT1 in IMCD cells. Treatment of IMCD cells with the SIRT1 inhibitors Ex527 (1 μM) and sirtinol (10 μM) or SIRT1 siRNA strikingly reduced the expression of SIRT1 (Figure 3A, 3L). Moreover, the IMCD cells were pretreated with Ex527 or sirtinol for 1 h or SIRT1 siRNA for 48 h, and then stimulated with TNF-α (20 μg/L) for 24 h. The results showed that SIRT1 inhibitors Ex527 and sirtinol decreased the expression of SIRT1 and AQP2 in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells (Figure 3I–3K). In addition, knockdown of SIRT1 remarkably decreased AQP2 mRNA and protein expression in IMCD cells exposed to TNF-α (Figure 3M, 3N).
NF-κB PATHWAY INHIBITED AQP2 EXPRESSION IN TNF-α-INDUCED IMCD CELLS:
To assess the acetylation of NF-κBp65 in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells, Western blot was performed. The results showed that treatment of IMCD cells with TNF-α (10, 20 and 40 μg/L) for 24 h significantly increased Ac-p65 protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 4A). We further studied the time courses of Ac-p65 expression in IMCD cells by treating with TNF-α (20 μg/L) for 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. The results showed that TNF-α up-regulated Ac-p65 protein expression in a time-dependent manner (Figure 4B).
To further assess whether NF-κB pathway was associated with the expression of AQP2 in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells, we silenced NF-κB pathway. Pretreatment with the NF-κB inhibitor PDTC (10 μM) or NF-κBp65 siRNA strikingly decreased Ac-p65 protein expression (Figure 4C, 4F). Then the IMCD cells were treated with PDTC for 1 h or NF-κBp65 siRNA for 48 h, and then stimulated with TNF-α (20μg/L) for 24 h. The results showed that PDTC visibly increased AQP2 mRNA and protein expression in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells (Figure 4D, 4E). Knockdown of NF-κBp65 was further supported the above results by increasing the expression of AQP2 in IMCD cells induce by TNF-α (Figure 4G, 4H).
SIRT1 INCREASED AQP2 EXPRESSION VIA NF-κB PATHWAY IN TNF-α-INDUCED IMCD CELLS:
To prove the relationship between SIRT1 and NF-κB in IMCD cells, the expression of Ac-p65 was assessed. We found that the SIRT1 activator SRT1720 significantly reduced Ac-p65 expression, which was reversed by the SIRT1 inhibitors Ex527 and sirtinol in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells (Figure 5A). Moreover, the SIRT1 overexpressing or knockdown cells were used to further verify the above results. The results revealed that SIRT1 overexpression significantly decreased TNF-α-induced Ac-p65 expression (Figure 5B), while knockdown of SIRT1 obviously increased Ac-p65 expression in IMCD cells expose to TNF-α (Figure 5C).
To further clarify the underlying mechanism involved in SIRT1-regulated AQP2 expression, NF-κB signaling was included. The results revealed that the expression of AQP2 was correspondingly increased after preconditioning of NF-κBp65 knockdown cells with pcDNA3.1(+)-SIRT1, compared with NF-κBp65 siRNA or pcDNA3.1(+)-SIRT1 single treatment in TNF-α-induced IMCD cells (Figure 5D). These results imply that SIRT1 can regulate AQP2 expression in IMCD cells stimulated with TNF-α via suppression of NF-κB signalling.
Discussions
Emerging evidence has suggested that SIRT1 expresses in medullary tubular cells, and protects and maintains kidney cell function [17]. Our present study found that treatment of IMCD cells with TNF-α significantly decreased SIRT1 expression at mRNA and protein levels in a time-and concentration-dependent manner. It has also revealed that high glucose obviously decreased SIRT1 mRNA and protein expression in rat mesangial cells [18]. Other studies have reported that SIRT1 expression was decreased in rats with gentamicin or cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity [19,20]. Moreover, reduced SIRT1 expression has been found in mouse cortical collecting duct cells [14], in human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells [21], and in rats with AKI induced by severe burns [22] and renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury [23]. Therefore, these findings imply that the decrease in SIRT1 expression is involved in renal injury processes
It has been shown that the abundance of AQP2 is decreased in collecting duct cells in a variety of water balance disorders as demonstrated in many studies [24]. The present study found that the expression of AQP2 mRNA and protein was time- and concentration- dependently decreased in IMCD cells in response to TNF-α. Hasler et al. revealed that LPS decreased AQP2 expression in cultured collecting duct principal cells [13]. In addition to
It is well recognized that the renoprotective effect of SIRT1 is due to deacetylating its target proteins, such as NF-κB, a master transcription factor involved in the development of renal disease [11,26]. The transcriptional activity of NF-κB requires acetylation at lysine 310 [27,28]. In the present study, TNF-α significantly increased the acetylation of NF-κBp65 (Lys 310) expression, which was reversed by SIRT1 overexpression or the activator SRT1720, and augmented by SIRT1 siRNA or the inhibitors Ex527 and sirtinol in IMCD cells. Other study further supported that TNF-α increased the acetylation of NF-κB at lysine 310 in fibroblasts, while this effect was inhibited by resveratrol via a SIRT1-dependent manner [29]. These findings show that SIRT1 plays renoprotective role in antagonizing inflammatory renal injury in IMCD cells through deacetylation of NF-κBp65 at lysine 310. Furthermore, it has been revealed that activation of NF-κB observed in renal diseases most likely accounts for the observed decrease in AQP2 expression [30]. The present study found that knockdown of NF-κB or the NF-κB inhibitor PDTC remarkably antagonized the downregulation of AQP2 induced by TNF-α in IMCD cells. Our results further found that knockdown of NF-κBp65 significantly augmented the effect of SIRT1 on increased expression of AQP2 in IMCD cells exposed to TNF-α. Similarly, SIRT1 activator resveratrol significantly increased AQP2 expression by suppressing the nuclear localization of the NF-κBp65 subunit
Conclusions
Our results provide a crucial role of SIRT1 in the regulation of AQP2 expression. Activation of SIRT1 efficiently inhibits water balance disorders. These findings might be important to understand the potential role of SIRT1 activation in water balance disorders-related diseases.
References
1. Bindu S, Pillai VB, Gupta MP, Role of sirtuins in regulating pathophysiology of the heart: Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2016; 27; 563-73, pmid: 27210897
2. Yacoub R, Lee K, He JC, The role of SIRT1 in diabetic kidney disease: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2014; 5; 166, pmid: 25346724
3. Wakino S, Hasegawa K, Itoh H, Sirtuin and metabolic kidney disease: Kidney Int, 2015; 88; 691-98, pmid: 26083654
4. Guclu A, Erdur FM, Turkmen K, The emerging role of Sirtuin 1 in cellular metabolism, diabetes mellitus, diabetic kidney disease and hypertension: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2016; 124; 131-39, pmid: 26588494
5. Hasegawa K, Wakino S, Yoshioka K, Kidney-specific overexpression of Sirt1 protects against acute kidney injury by retaining peroxisome function: J Biol Chem, 2010; 285; 13045-56, pmid: 20139070
6. Hasegawa K, Wakino S, Simic P, Renal tubular Sirt1 attenuates diabetic albuminuria by epigenetically suppressing Claudin-1 overexpression in podocytes: Nat Med, 2013; 19; 1496-504, pmid: 24141423
7. Gao R, Chen J, Hu Y, Sirt1 deletion leads to enhanced inflammation and aggravates endotoxin-induced acute kidney injury: PLoS One, 2014; 9; e98909, pmid: 24896770
8. Cha SA, Park BM, Jung YJ, Regional heterogeneity of expression of renal NPRs, TonEBP, and AQP-2 mRNAs in rats with acute kidney injury: Peptides, 2015; 69; 33-39, pmid: 25858778
9. Kwon TH, Frokiaer J, Fernandez-Llama P, ReducedReduced abundance of aquaporins in rats with bilateral ischemia-induced acute renal failure: Prevention by alpha-MSH: Am J Physiol, 1999; 277; F413-27, pmid: 10484525
10. Rodrigues CE, Sanches TR, Volpini RA, Effects of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury and multi-organ dysfunction: PLoS One, 2012; 7; e29893, pmid: 22235348
11. Liu R, Zhong Y, Li X, Role of transcription factor acetylation in diabetic kidney disease: Diabetes, 2014; 63; 2440-53, pmid: 24608443
12. Lee JH, Song MY, Song EK, Overexpression of SIRT1 protects pancreatic beta-cells against cytokine toxicity by suppressing the nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathway: Diabetes, 2009; 58; 344-51, pmid: 19008341
13. Hasler U, Leroy V, Jeon US, NF-kappaB modulates aquaporin-2 transcription in renal collecting duct principal cells: J Biol Chem, 2008; 283; 28095-105, pmid: 18703515
14. Bae EH, Joo SY, Ma SK, Lee J, Kim SW, Resveratrol attenuates 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal-induced oxidative stress in mouse cortical collecting duct cells: Korean J Physiol Pharmacol, 2016; 20; 229-36, pmid: 27162476
15. Hocherl K, Schmidt C, Kurt B, Bucher M: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2010; 298; F196-204, pmid: 19828675
16. Faust D, Geelhaar A, Eisermann B, Culturing primary rat inner medullary collecting duct cells: J Vis Exp, 2013(76)
17. Dong YJ, Liu N, Xiao Z, Renal protective effect of sirtuin 1: J Diabetes Res, 2014; 2014; 843786, pmid: 25386563
18. Du YG, Wang LP, Qian JW, Panax notoginseng saponins protect kidney from diabetes by up-regulating silent information regulator 1 and activating antioxidant proteins in rats: Chin J Integr Med, 2015 [Epub ahead of print]
19. He L, Peng X, Zhu J, Protective effects of curcumin on acute gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats: Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 2015; 93; 275-82, pmid: 25730179
20. Ugur S, Ulu R, Dogukan A, The renoprotective effect of curcumin in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: Ren Fail, 2015; 37; 332-36
21. Wang XL, Wu LY, Zhao L: Biomed Pharmacother, 2016; 83; 41-50, pmid: 27470548
22. Bai XZ, He T, Gao JX, Melatonin prevents acute kidney injury in severely burned rats via the activation of SIRT1: Sci Rep, 2016; 6; 32199, pmid: 27599451
23. Zhao L, Xu L, Tao X, Protective effect of the total flavonoids from Rosa laevigata Michx fruit on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through suppression of oxidative stress and inflammation: Molecules, 2016; 21(7) pii: E952
24. Nielsen S, Frokiaer J, Marples D, Aquaporins in the kidney: From molecules to medicine: Physiol Rev, 2002; 82; 205-44, pmid: 11773613
25. Huang YY, Sun JY, Wang JY, Terlipressin resolves ascites of cirrhotic rats through downregulation of aquaporin 2: J Int Med Res, 2012; 40; 1735-44, pmid: 23206455
26. Jung YJ, Lee JE, Lee AS, SIRT1 overexpression decreases cisplatin-induced acetylation of NF-kappaB p65 subunit and cytotoxicity in renal proximal tubule cells: Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2012; 419; 206-10, pmid: 22330808
27. Tak PP, Firestein GS, NF-kappaB: A key role in inflammatory diseases: J Clin Invest, 2001; 107; 7-11, pmid: 11134171
28. Chen LF, Mu Y, Greene WC, Acetylation of RelA at discrete sites regulates distinct nuclear functions of NF-kappaB: EMBO J, 2002; 21; 6539-48, pmid: 12456660
29. Zhu X, Liu Q, Wang M, Activation of Sirt1 by resveratrol inhibits TNF-alpha induced inflammation in fibroblasts: PLoS One, 2011; 6; e27081, pmid: 22069489
30. Hasler U, Leroy V, Martin PY, Feraille E, Aquaporin-2 abundance in the renal collecting duct: New insights from cultured cell models: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2009; 297; F10-18, pmid: 19244407
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Apr 2020 : Original article 19,586
Outcome of 24 Weeks of Combined Schroth and Pilates Exercises on Cobb Angle, Angle of Trunk Rotation, Chest...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.920449
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e920449
20 Apr 2018 : Original article 17,466
Brain Training Games Enhance Cognitive Function in Healthy SubjectsDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.909022
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2018; 24:63-69
23 Jul 2016 : Review article 10,353
Cardiac Hypertrophy: An Introduction to Molecular and Cellular BasisDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.900437
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:75-79
10 Aug 2020 : Clinical Research 9,788
Effects of Cognitive Task Training on Dynamic Balance and Gait of Patients with Stroke: A Preliminary Rando...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.925264
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e925264






