30 April 2015: Hypothesis
Molluscs as Models for Translational Medicine
Fabio Tascedda AE , Davide Malagoli E , Alice Accorsi F , Giovanna Rigillo B , Johanna M.C. Blom D , Enzo Ottaviani AEF
DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.894221
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2015; 21:96-99
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This paper describes the advantages of adopting a molluscan model for studying the biological basis of some central nervous system pathologies affecting humans. In particular, we will focus on the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis, which is already the subject of electrophysiological studies related to learning and memory, as well as ecotoxicological studies. The genome of L. stagnalis has been sequenced and annotated but the gene characterization has not yet been performed. We consider the characterization of the gene networks that play crucial roles in development and functioning of the central nervous system in L. stagnalis, an important scientific development that comparative biologists should pursue. This important effort would add a new experimental model to the limited number of invertebrates already used in studies of translational medicine, the discipline that seeks to improve human health by taking advantage of knowledge collected at the molecular and cellular levels in non-human organisms.
Keywords: Central Nervous System - physiopathology, Gene Regulatory Networks - genetics, Lymnaea - physiology, Models, Animal, Translational Medical Research - trends
Background
In recent decades, basic and applied biomedical research has made huge progress and provided a large amount of information. Unfortunately, these great efforts and knowledge gained have not been quickly followed by the desired and expected therapeutic results [1]. This has great significance for several diseases affecting the central nervous system for which, at present, there is no effective treatment (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia). Traditionally, the process of drug discovery begins with the identification of one or more target proteins that are potentially implicated in a specific human disease. The identification of target proteins is followed by the search for one or more chemicals that can alter the function of the target proteins. This last phase consists of the screening of many chemical compounds to evaluate their effects in the animal models usually used for studying the pathology of interest. The process of identifying a single promising compound among thousands of candidates may take a long time and tens of millions of dollars, with no guarantee of success. The animal models used most frequently in this screening process are small mammals (i.e., rats and mice) and primates. This approach, which is not always effective, led to many protests and fueled much scientific, ethical, economic, and social discussion, as well as leading to profound changes in the law associated with ethical restrictions in animal experiments. The high cost of these studies and the increasing difficulties in obtaining permits for experimentation prompted researchers to look for other strategies. Many researchers have attempted to solve the problem by using
Despite the many advances in biological and biomedical sciences, the understanding of incurable diseases remains inadequate. The disparity between the huge amount of information on the molecular and cell biology and the modest capacity to intervene in important human neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease may appear incongruous. Researchers have in part clarified how cells work individually but they also clearly showed how extremely sophisticated and complex are the processes that allow the survival or alter the proper functioning of multicellular organisms [1]. In this complex picture more effective and ethical approaches in biomedical research are required, exceeding the practical and conceptual limitations of experiments on mammals and on cell cultures.
Development of Alternatives to Mammalian Models
The evolutionary process that prompted the diversity among species also promoted the conservation of numerous key physiological processes that are well preserved across species, including humans [3,4]. Unlike mammals, invertebrates frequently have short generation times, numerous offspring, and can be more easily experimentally manipulated. If detailed genetic information is available, powerful genetic tools allow a fine dissection of the metabolic pathways, allowing to understand the basic mechanisms of physiology and pathology in the analyzed organism. On this basis, it is not surprising that some of the most advanced research on invertebrates [5] in the biomedical field provide a quick and efficient way to develop treatments for human diseases [6]. Today, the most common and best characterized invertebrate models are the insect
New Directions of Translational Medicine
Invertebrates are a valid alternative model in the study and characterization of human disease processes and in the discovery and development of new drug therapies. Invertebrate models have many advantages compared to mammalian models, including significant experimental efficiency due to the reduced time needed for experiments and the low costs required for their care. Moreover, conservation of fundamental gene networks in invertebrate models allows researchers to benefit from projects focused on humans. The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project (www.encodeproject.org) has provided, for the first time, many functional and regulatory elements in the genome (e.g.
Compared to the established models
Conclusions
Because of historical, economic, and cultural/ethical advances, the use of mammals in biomedical research is increasingly expensive and restricted. This has created a pressing demand for alternative models that are less expensive but still effective to study the basis of human physiology and pathology. This now seems possible thanks to the great advances in comparative genomics that made possible the use of animal models that are cheap, simple, and easy to handle but in some situations just as effective as mammalian models due to the availability of their genomes and molecular tools important in analyzing gene networks. In this context, the neurobiological and genetic characterization of
References
1. Alberts B, Model organisms and human health: Science, 2010; 330; 1724, pmid: 21177975
2. Viscomi C, Bottani E, Zeviani M, Emerging concepts in the therapy of mitochondrial disease: Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015; 1847; 544-57, pmid: 25766847
3. Ottaviani E, Malagoli D, Franceschi C: Trends Immunol, 2007; 28; 497-502, pmid: 17962071
4. Ottaviani E, The importance of studying invertebrate immune-neuroendocrine functions: Inv Surv J, 2014; 11; 1-3
5. Ottaviani E, Accorsi A, Rigillo G: Brain Res, 2013; 1537; 18-26, pmid: 24041774
6. Harel I, Benayoun BA, Machado B, A platform for rapid exploration of aging and diseases in a naturally short-lived vertebrate: Cell, 2015; 160; 1013-26, pmid: 25684364
7. Pandey UB, Nichols CD: Pharm Rev, 2011; 63; 411-36, pmid: 21415126
8. Sherwood NM, Tello JA, Roch GJ: Comp Biochem Physiol, 2006; 144A; 254-71
9. Wang Y, Jorda M, Jones PL, Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect: Science, 2006; 314; 645-47, pmid: 17068262
10. Walsh TK, Brisson JA, Robertson HM: Insect Mol Biol, 2010; 19(Suppl); 215-28, pmid: 20482652
11. Lyko F, Maleszka R, Insects as innovative models for functional studies of DNA methylation: Trends Genet, 2011; 27; 127-31, pmid: 21288591
12. Vaughan C, Pearsall I, Yeudall A, p53: its mutations and their impact on transcription: Subcell Biochem, 2014; 85; 71-90, pmid: 25201189
13. Kelley ML, Winge P, Heaney JD: Oncogene, 2001; 20; 748-58, pmid: 11314008
14. Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Ren B, Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach: Nature Rev Genet, 2010; 11; 476-86, pmid: 20531367
15. Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL: Science, 2010; 330; 1775-87, pmid: 21177976
16. The modENCODE Consortium et al: Science, 2010; 330; 1787-97, pmid: 21177974
17. Murakami J, Okada R, Sadamoto H: J Neurosci, 2013; 33; 371-83, pmid: 23283349
18. Takigami S, Sunada H, Lukowiak K, Sakakibara M: Neurosci Lett, 2013; 555; 149-53, pmid: 24076143
19. Kemenes G: Gen Pharmacol, 1997; 29; 7-15, pmid: 9195188
20. Hermann PM, Watson SN, Wildering WC, Phospholipase A2 – nexus of aging, oxidative stress, neuronal excitability, and functional decline of the aging nervous system? Insights from a snail model system of neuronal aging and age-associated memory impairment: Front Genet, 2014; 5; 419, pmid: 25538730
21. Tascedda F, Ottaviani E, Tumors in invertebrates: Inv Surv J, 2014; 11; 197-203
22. De Vico G, Carella F, Tumors in invertebrates: molluscs as an emerging animal model for human cancer: Inv Surv J, 2015; 12; 19-21
23. Stefano GB, Mantione KJ, Casares FM, Kream RM: Inv Surv J, 2015; 12; 22-28
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Apr 2020 : Original article 19,586
Outcome of 24 Weeks of Combined Schroth and Pilates Exercises on Cobb Angle, Angle of Trunk Rotation, Chest...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.920449
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e920449
20 Apr 2018 : Original article 17,466
Brain Training Games Enhance Cognitive Function in Healthy SubjectsDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.909022
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2018; 24:63-69
23 Jul 2016 : Review article 10,353
Cardiac Hypertrophy: An Introduction to Molecular and Cellular BasisDOI :10.12659/MSMBR.900437
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2016; 22:75-79
10 Aug 2020 : Clinical Research 9,788
Effects of Cognitive Task Training on Dynamic Balance and Gait of Patients with Stroke: A Preliminary Rando...DOI :10.12659/MSMBR.925264
Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2020; 26:e925264






